Appeal Victory Sets Crucial Legal Precedent for Defective Equipment Injuries: Raul Camacho vs. JLG Industries Inc.
This recent appeal is set to have far-reaching implications for individuals injured by defective equipment. The appeal resulted in a reversal of the previous judgment, establishing important legal principles and paving the way for justice and accountability in specific types of product liability cases.
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 2, 2023 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- The recent victory in the appeal from the judgment and order of the Superior Court of Orange County, presided by Judge Robert J. Moss, is set to have far-reaching implications for individuals injured by defective equipment. In the case of Raul Camacho vs. JLG Industries Inc., the appeal resulted in a reversal of the previous judgment, establishing important legal principles and paving the way for justice and accountability in product liability cases.
The original lawsuit stemmed from an incident where Raul Camacho suffered severe injuries while installing glass panels, after falling out of a scissor lift manufactured by JLG Industries Inc. Camacho alleged that the scissor lift's design, which included an unlatched chain meant to guard the lift's entrance, invited human error and created a foreseeable risk of harm. He further argued that JLG should have marketed an alternative design with a self-closing gate, which would have prevented the accident.
During the jury trial, JLG moved for a directed verdict, seeking a judgment in its favor before the case went to the jury. The trial court granted the motion, ruling that Camacho needed to prove that the accident would have happened even if the chain had been latched. However, the appeal court disagreed with this ruling and reversed the judgment, ordering the trial court to vacate its order granting a directed verdict as to Camacho's causes of action.
The appeal court found that Camacho made a strong prima facie showing of causation. Based on photographic evidence, it appeared that the scissor lift's design, with the unlatched chain, was a substantial factor in causing Camacho's injuries. The court recognized that the jury could have reasonably inferred that had a self-closing gate been in place, Camacho's fall would have been prevented. Similarly, the court held that the jurors could have reasonably inferred that JLG's allegedly defective warning label also played a substantial role in causing Camacho's injuries.
The success of this appeal is critical for others injured by defective equipment for several reasons. First and foremost, it sets a powerful legal precedent that can be referenced in future cases with similar circumstances. This precedent supports victims seeking compensation for injuries caused by defective equipment, encouraging more favorable judgments in similar cases.
Moreover, the appeal victory serves as a strong deterrent to manufacturers and companies, urging them to prioritize product safety and avoid negligence in their designs. The increased vigilance in ensuring product safety can lead to a reduction in future injuries caused by faulty equipment.
Furthermore, this victory enhances access to justice for those injured by defective equipment. It provides a clearer path for victims to seek legal action and empowers them to hold corporations accountable for their actions or negligence.
The ruling also reinforces the importance of appropriate compensation and damages for the injured party and their families. It highlights the significance of compensating victims for medical expenses, lost wages, rehabilitation costs, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from defective equipment injuries.
Finally, the attention brought to this high-profile case can raise public awareness about product safety issues, leading to demands for stricter regulations and standards. This, in turn, ensures that dangerous products are identified and removed from the market more effectively, promoting a safer environment for consumers.
The legal team, led by Attorney Emily Ruby, is proud to have secured this appeal victory and to stay true to their mission of holding wrongdoers accountable and making the world a safer place.
About Greenberg & Ruby Injury Attorneys, APC
Greenberg and Ruby Injury Attorneys, APC is a California work injury law firm that focuses on third party liability work injuries. Those who have been injured at work due to defective equipment or dangerous premises turn to Greenberg and Ruby for representation specific to their needs. Attorney Emily Ruby is a 2022 "Women in Law" award winner and has an impressive 97.4% win rate.
Greenberg and Ruby Injury Attorneys
6100 Wilshire Blvd #1170
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Media Contact
John Bisnar, Greenberg and Ruby Injury Attorneys, 44 7147883900, [email protected], https://www.greenbergrubylaw.com
SOURCE Greenberg and Ruby Injury Attorneys
News published on and distributed by:
