Sandmann v. Washington Post: A Legal Analysis on How the Court Got it Wrong
SAN FRANCISCO, July 31, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- In the wake of the dismissal of Sandmann v. Washington Post, Rohit Chhabra, a San Francisco based internet defamation attorney poses the question: "As a society, should we permit powerful organizations and well trusted newspapers to satiate their obsessive demagoguery at the expense of ordinary citizens?"
In a 3,000+ word blog post, titled, "The Sandmann v. Washington Post Lawsuit: How the court got it wrong," Chhabra argues that the court did not adhere to proper legal principles and contradicted its own findings.
"This decision is troubling," states Chhabra, who has represented clients at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
In his post, Chhabra contends that the court failed to "hold the media accountable for its blatant disregard of the truth, for its failure to fact check its 'sources,' and for its failure to protect the reputation and character of innocent civilians."
Chhabra Law Firm, PC is a San Francisco, California based law firm. Chhabra Law was established in 2015 as an alternative to large law firms. Clients of Chhabra Law receive the same quality of services offered by large law firms while, at an average, saving around 40% in their overall legal expenses.
Media Contact:
Rohit Chhabra
[email protected]
Phone: 650-564-7929
SOURCE Chhabra Law Firm, PC
News published on and distributed by:
