Le Lézard
Subjects: NPT, LEG, STP, AVO

Independent Map Amendment Coalition Statement in Response to U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Independent Redistricting Commissions

CHICAGO, June 29, 2015 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Cynthia Canary, Executive Director of Independent Maps coalition, issued the following statement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission:

Independent Map Amendment Logo

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling erases any doubt about the constitutionality of redistricting by independent commissions. 

The Court majority opinion also made it clear that states with independent commissions have succeeded to a great degree in limiting the conflicts of interest that occur when legislators have control over drawing of legislative district maps.  Independent redistricting commissions "impede legislators from choosing their voters instead of facilitating the voters' choice of their representatives," according to the opinion.  The court said the people of Arizona used the initiative process to curb gerrymandering and restore the core principle of republican government ? that voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around.

Today, it's clear that there is no federal constitutional prohibition on any redistricting commissions.

The petition drive to put the Independent Map Amendment before Illinois voters continues, full speed ahead.

The current redistricting process in Illinois has state legislators in charge of drawing the boundary lines of their own districts.  It has so damaged our democracy that nearly 60 percent of legislators elected last year didn't even have an opponent.  Redistricting by an independent commission will help restore representative democracy and give voters more choices.  

Illinois voters don't want district boundaries manipulated to benefit an incumbent or party.  They want to choose their own representatives. 


The Independent Map Amendment would create an 11-member commission representing the demographic and geographic diversity of the state. The commission meetings and records would be open to the public, and the commission would be required to hold public hearings throughout the state. The commission drawn maps would be required to protect the voting rights of racial and ethnic minorities, and the maps would be drawn without regard to incumbency or partisanship. Adoption of the maps would require approval of seven commissioners, including at least two Democrats and two Republicans.

The amendment text and more detailed explanation of the reform are available at www.MapAmendment.org.

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20150423/201324LOGO


SOURCE Independent Map Amendment Coalition

News published on 29 june 2015 at 13:23 and distributed by: