New EPC Study Shows LMI Households Rely on Credit Card Rewards
The Electronic Payments Coalition today released a new report examining how American consumers, including lower-income consumers, utilize reward credit cards and how proposals restricting card issuers' ability to offer reward credit cards would adversely impact cardholders of all incomes. The study found the share of credit cards offering rewards is nearly identical across income and cardholders, regardless of income, earn rewards at virtually equal rates.
The main difference in rewards usage across incomes was in how rewards are redeemed. While all accountholders prefer "cashback" rewards, low- to moderate-income (LMI) accounts have a stronger preference for cash, with spikes in November and December as well as during late summer and back-to-school shopping season. Expressed as a share of income, the boost represented through rewards is three to four times larger for LMI cardholders than for the highest income cardholders. For context, rewards earned by LMI cardholders amounts to a 17 cent per gallon annual discount at the gas pump ? a tangible savings for these households.
"Americans of all incomes take advantage of credit card reward programs but the most financially vulnerable households depend on cashback rewards to help make ends meet," EPC Executive Chairman Richard Hunt said. "Saying credit card reward programs only help the rich or are just about getting lounge access at the airport is nothing more than willingly ignoring the full picture. Hardworking Americans rely on their rewards to help make ends meet and manage their daily finances. For many, these credit card rewards served as a lifeline during the record inflation of the last few years."
The key findings from the report include:
- Rewards are for everyone. Since 2020, rewards card ownership has grown the fastest among the low-to-moderate (LMI) income segment. Currently more than two-thirds of LMI cardholders own a rewards card. This result illustrates that rewards cards are popular amongst low-income households, and that reward programs do not exclusively serve upper-income customers.
- Rewards supplement consumer income. All cardholders receive a boost to income from their rewards. Many cardholders save up rewards over the course of months to supplement holiday and back-to-school shopping. In fact, total rewards savings in 2023 accounted for 23%-32% of planned holiday purchasing. Consumers also use their rewards to supplement everyday expenses, with some studies suggesting consumers now rely on their rewards cards more than ever in the face of rising inflation.
- There is no cross-subsidy or so-called "Reverse Robin Hood." Rewards redemption rates are similar across income groups, suggesting that each income group is taking advantage of their rewards at the same level. Moreover, rewards earned and redeemed are nearly identical across income segments after controlling for spending, directly countering the RRH argument that low-income segments subsidize rewards for wealthier consumers.
- Rewards are especially important to lower-income consumers. Low-income consumers deeply value credit card rewards. LMI accounts are most likely to redeem rewards for cash, implying that this income segment uses rewards for everyday spending needs. Rewards have a significantly larger financial impact on LMI cardholders than higher-income cardholders. Removing or reducing reward programs would negatively impact low-income households' finances more than any other income group.
The study also found rewards earned from using credit cards can help offset price increases, but cash and debit card users do not benefit from rewards and thus lose out on potential savings generated through cashback rewards. Some have argued merchants simply pass through the cost of card acceptance to all consumers, but the report cites the benefits of credit card acceptance, which can lead to an uptick in purchases that ultimately results in a 5-6.4% net benefit to merchants, even after factoring in acceptance cost.
While the increased profitability generated by accepting credit cards means that there is little business rationale to raise prices, for retailers who nonetheless choose to impose surcharges on credit card users to recoup card acceptance costs, the so-called Reverse Robin Hood effort still fails to hold up because the cardholder alone bears the additional cost. Moreover, as the experience of the Durbin amendment demonstrates and myriad research studies have proven, large retailers have failed to pass through savings from debit card interchange reductions to their customers by lowering prices.
Finally, reward cardholders often carry a balance of unredeemed rewards. This represents an important safety net for these cardholders.
The EPC study was conducted during the first quarter of 2024 among EPC members and represents more than half of the credit card market as measured by purchase volume. The study excluded cobranded, small business, and international rewards cards. Income segments were approximated using the Community Reinvestment Act income bands.
The full study can be found HERE.
About The Electronic Payments Coalition (EPC):
We are the credit unions, community banks, payment card networks, and institutions that support the backbone of our economic system: electronic payments.
News published on and distributed by:
